|
|
5 (20 pts.)
|
4 (18 pts.)
|
3 (16 pts.)
|
2 (14 pts.)
|
1 (12 pts.)
|
|
Team
Work
|
The student continually contributes and participates
(verbally and nonverbally) in the group. S/he is integral to the
collaborative nature of the group (e.g. accepting ideas, presenting
ideas, generating hypotheses, refining procedures, reflecting, etc.)
|
Most of the time the student contributes and participates
in the group. There is a concerted effort to create an effective
group, yet there is room for improvement.
|
The student attempts to contribute and participate
in the group. Sometimes, s/he is judgmental or nonparticipating.
There is clearly room for improvement.
|
The student contributes and participates minimally.
There are opportunities for collaboration but the student either
ignores these or does not recognize them.
|
The student does very little to participate or contribute
to the group or she/he dominates the group. The student has no sense
of the group and its needs.
|
|
Generate
Ideas/
Hypothesis
|
The student presents ideas and/or actively generates
hypotheses that are testable. Is concerned about the quality of
the hypothesis and is involved in the refining process.
|
The student presents ideas and/or generates hypotheses
that are testable yet lack refinement and fails to recognize this.
|
The student either presents ideas or refines others,
or both in a limited manner. The student has a hypothesis that is
testable but could use more revision; the student does not realize
this.
|
The student contributes few ideas and/or hypotheses
and has little concern with quality. There are several problems
with the ideas/hypotheses that are either recognized and are not
changed, or not recognized.
|
The student is minimally involved in contributing
ideas or generating or refining hypotheses. S/he has no regard for
quality.
|
|
Develop a
Plan
|
The student works to develop a plan that is thorough
and appropriate for the idea/hypothesis. S/he clearly identifies
variables and continually engages in the process of plan finalization.
|
The student works to develop a plan that is thorough
and appropriate for the idea/hypothesis. The plan is mostly complete
and identifies some variables. The student sees no need for further
revision.
|
The student gives some input into the plan. The
plan is not as thorough as it could be, but the student does not
recognize this. Identification of variables is limited or absent.
|
The student provides minimal assistance in developing
the plan. S/he contributes an incomplete plan and shows no regard
for variables. The emphasis is on getting the plan done.
|
The student contributes very little to the plan
design and has no regard for its completeness.
|
|
Solve the
Problem
|
The student makes precise observations; records
and analyzes data thoroughly and accurately. S/he seeks to make
valid conclusions which are consistent with scientific principles;
desires to construct a quality product. Fully understands all the
science concepts and effectively uses knowledge to solve problem.
|
The student makes accurate observations; records
and analyzes data adequately and makes basic conclusions from the
data which are mostly appropriate but may not be totally supported.
Understands most of the science concepts and applies knowledge to
solving the problem.
|
The student makes basic observations; records data
but analysis and/or conclusions are incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.
Understands some of science concepts but is lacking in recognizing
how they relate to solving the problem.
|
The student makes limited observations; records
and analyzes data in a minimal manner and conclusions are incomplete,
inaccurate, and/or inappropriate. Has minimal understanding of the
science concepts and has difficulty relating the concepts to a solution
to the problem.
|
The student makes little effort in making observations,
recording or analyzing data or making conclusions. Shows very little
understanding of the science concepts and cannot recognize how the
concepts relate to solving the problem.
|
|
Share the
Results
|
The student has a role in the discussion. S/he has
been responsible in collecting materials (if needed), answers questions,
and presents with clarity. Overall quality of delivery is high and
the information presented is thorough.
|
The student participates in the discussion. The
delivery is clear but not polished. The information presented is
acceptable and informative.
|
The student participates in the discussion. The
delivery needs practice. The information presented is not complete.
|
The students role is minimal. The delivery
is impromptu and the information presented is minimal and lacking.
|
The student takes very little role in the discussion
and demonstrates very little knowledge of the results of the experiment.
|