Classification of Echinocereus triglochidiatus
and Geographical Ranges of its Varieties - Answer Key

Assignment: (20 points)

(1) Read the attached table from a book called "Cacti of the United States and Canada" written and published in 1982 by Lyman Benson. Government agencies and many botanists refer to this book for the taxonomy of this species of cactus.

Cactus Anatomy: In order to read and understand what the literature says about the descriptions and classification of cacti, an understanding of the general anatomy of a cactus is helpful. Refer to the following diagram to identify each of the following structures: stem, ribs, areoles, spines (central and radial)

(2) Study the the distributions of each of the four varieties of E. triglochidiatus and draw in the ranges of each of the varieties on the map provided, using a different colored pencil for each variety, and making a legend in the lower left-hand corner of the map to indicate which variety is represented by which color. (7 points)

See attached map.

(3) Study the descriptions of the stem, rib and spine characteristics to determine what characteristics are definitive of the arizonicus and neomexicanus varieties. Make a list of the characteristics of each of these two varieties. (7 points)

Characteristics

var. arizonicus

var. neomexicanus

# of stems

few stems

5-45 stems

stem size

to 40 cm long

20-30 cm long

# of stem ribs

±10 ribs

8-12 ribs (mostly 10)

spine color

dark gray spines

tan or pink spines, becoming gray

spine length

to 3.8 cm long

to 3.8 cm long

central spines

1-3 gray or pinkish central spines

2-4 gray central spines

radial spines

5-11 radial spines, shorter than

9-12 radial spines, half as long as

# of central spines

1-3 central spines

2-4 central spines

stem diameter

stem diameter 7.5-10 cm

stem diameter 7.5-10 cm

(4) Formulate a Hypothesis: Based on the slide photographs of each variety, the geographical ranges and the descriptions of the characteristics of each variety of cactus, do you think that arizonicus is a distinct variety? Or, do you think that populations in SE Arizona (called var. neomexicanus) could also be arizonicus? State your hypothesis below and give a reason/rationale for your opinion. (6 points)